Thursday, November 10, 2011

UK academics now have to demonstrate the impact of their research beyond the academic community, including especially impact on decisions, policies, practice (beyond inspiring research!).

This is a little harder than anticipated, most particularly because the research could have been undertaken since 1995, but the impacts sought for, are since 2008. Nevertheless, Foresight research would be an obvious candidate for us in Manchester, no?

While looking for evidence of impact of work of the FOREN project,
 see for example http://community.iknowfutures.eu/pg/file/popper/view/2210/practical-guide-to-regional-foresight-in-the-uk  for one of the more than 15 versions of the 2nd edition of the Practical Guide

I found this on FOR-LEARN website, hidden down in the references:
"The FOREN guide has been used as the starting basis for the FOR-LEARN online Foresight guide as it was already considered as a reference by many of the experts interviewed."
this is on page http://forlearn.jrc.ec.europa.eu/guide/A2_references/foren.htm
which you have to link from via http://forlearn.jrc.ec.europa.eu/guide/A2_references/index.htm
which cites FOREN as the 5th of its "main sources".


Looking at FOR-LEARN, this extensively borrows, on numerous pages (and in terms of overall ideas), from The Practical Guide.  And the way it does so, it is only the more-than-casual user who bothers to follow up on sources, who will find where this material is borrowed from.

Hmm: "FOR-LEARN... was developed by JRC-IPTS with the financial support of the Directorate General for Research, from January 2005 up to May 2008"  So it is a plausible "impact", though the JRC-IPTS authors have not been very helpful in directing us to this. 

"The team which has developed the FORLEARN Online Guide or contributed to it consists of:Cristiano Cagnin;Olivier Da Costa; Tibor Döry;Duncan Gilson;Totti Könnölä;Valentina Pierantozzi;Fabiana Scapolo;Antoine Schoen;Philine Warnke;Tennessee Witney" there is no mention of the FOREN team here, though one of these people was a co-author of the original Practical Guide!
There is one other FOREN name in the acknowledgements page of FOR-LEARN.

And to be clear, FOR-LEARN does contain new material, including some rich case study documentation.

But the absence of proper acknowledgement of the earlier project makes it difficult for me now, as you will see - and is surely not good practice for a Research Centre.  


Monday, October 10, 2011



Strategic Foresight for Corporate and Regional Development
 Michel Godet with Philippe Durance,  2011
Editor : DUNOD - UNESCO - Fondation Prospective et Innovation
 
Strategic  Foresight for Corporate and Regional Development is the English version of the recently revised and enhanced French edition of La prospective stratégique pour les entreprises et les territoires by Michel Godet and Philippe Durance.   The French edition of Strategic Foresight for Corporate and Regional Development is going to be published late 2011 by Dunod.Download french content. Translation of this manual into seven languages (English, Portuguese, Spanish, Chinese, Arabic, German, Italian)  has begun with the cooperation of the UNESCO Prospective Unit, the Circle of Entrepreneurs of the Future and the Fondation Prospective et Innovation. All versions will gradually become available online to download free of charge.
Language Title Contents Full Text
English Strategic Foresight
 
Strategic Foresight
Download
Portuguese A prospectiva estratégica
 
A prospectiva estratégica
Baixar
Chinese 战略展望学
 
战略展望学
下载
Arab الاستشراف الاستراتيجي للمؤسسات والأقاليم
 
الاستشراف الاستراتيجي للمؤسسات والأقاليم
تنزيل
German Strategische Vorausschau
 
Strategische Vorausschau
Herunterladen
Spaniard La prospectiva estratégica
 
La prospectiva estratégica
Descarga

Sunday, March 13, 2011

Flood catastrophe exercise

- remember the Foresight programme study of Flooding and Coastal Defence

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/mar/07/flood-catastrophe-exercise-watermark-emergency

Flood catastrophe exercise to test Britain's emergency services

Exercise Watermark will involve 10,000 people from police to prison officers in testing emergency flood response
  • The Guardian,
  • Article history
  • britain's emergency services test responses
    Britain's biggest ever civil emergency exercise sees, among others, flash floods drowning London. Photograph: Robert Graves /Didier Madoc-Jones
    Flash floods will drown London and Yorkshire, a major reservoir will blow out in Derbyshire, rivers will burst their banks from the Thames valley to Wales and a tidal surge will swamp the east coast in the armageddon scenario underpinning Britain's biggest ever civil emergency exercise. Exercise Watermark will involve 10,000 people from the police to prison officers and equipment from helicopters to hospitals, testing the nation's ability to respond to a range of major flood emergencies. At its heart is a plasma screen-decked control room in Fareham, Hampshire, from where Environment Agency planners will reveal the simulated disasters to responders across England and Wales, with each major event getting its own day. Local emergency services, councils and community groups will be the first to react, before escalating the response through hospitals, water and energy companies and the armed forces all the way up to ministers and a meeting of the government's top crisis response committee, Cobra. The "players" in the exercise, including environment minister Richard Benyon, will have no advance details of the emergencies and will react in real time. "This is a really major event," said Benyon. "Regrettably, one thing is certain, especially with the influence of climate change: there will be more floods in future. The exercise provides a unique opportunity for us to test our responses." The Environment Agency chairman, Lord (Chris) Smith, said: "One in six properties in England and Wales is at risk from flooding. Exercise Watermark will help protect lives and homes against future floods." He said it was very unlikely the four emergencies would all happen in the same week, but an EA spokesman added: "We have seen big events of all these types at separate times in recent years." "Every one of those is a realistic scenario, absolutely," said Charles Tucker, chair of the National Flood Forum, which represents more than 200 community groups. "Hundreds of communities have been flooded over the last decade and hundreds more will be flooded in the next decade: it is the nightmare waiting to come to a street near you." That, he said, is why the exercise and its focus on protecting people from harm is valuable. The exercise will cost £1.8m but follows year-on-year government cuts of £144m in flood defence spending. Several live rescues will take place, with RAF helicopters lifting stranded passengers from the roofs of stranded buses at Lake Bala in Gwynedd and boats rescuing people from submerged cars and caravans at Tattershall country park, Lincolnshire. Instant flood defences will be built and schools and care homes evacuated as part of the exercise. "We will not get everything right in Exercise Watermark, but the point is to learn from the mistakes," said Benyon. The planners will be able to change the storyline as events unfold to test responses fully. "Floods can happen at any time," said David Rooke, the EA's director of flood and coastal risk management. "I have been in Cobra meetings chaired by the prime minister at 6 in the morning and 11 at night." The previous biggest civil emergency exercise was called Winter Willow and tested the national response in 2007 to a bird flu epidemic. Previous exercises, such as Atlantic Blue in 2005, tested the response to terrorism attacks. A full-scale national emergency exercise was one of the key recommendations of the Pitt Review, which analysed what went wrong during the devastating floods of 2007. While the exercise has been broadly welcomed by those concerned with flooding, there is concern that the significant cuts to flood defence spending, at a time when risk is rising owing to climate change, will mean fewer people gaining flood protection. "Obviously, putting up new flood defences is essential and it will be a struggle to find the funding in the next 10 years," said Tucker. Last month, the Guardian revealed that the government's cuts had slashed the number of flood defence projects in line for funding in 2011-12 from 630 to 356, including major projects in Leeds, York and Morpeth. In total, more than 1,000 projects that had been in line for funding by 2015 now have no projected budget. Mary Creagh, Labour's shadow environment secretary, said: "Around 5.2m homes are at risk from floods in the UK so it is vital that our public services plan for and practise large-scale emergencies. Yet the Tory-led government cannot escape from the reckless gamble they have taken by cutting the flood defence budget by 27% over the next four years. Major flood defence projects have been cancelled, and people are worried about the availability of flood insurance when Labour's deal with the insurance industry runs out in 2013." Benyon said: "We have protected flood defence spending way in excess of other areas of spending across government. There will always be more we would like to do."

    The real deal

    The calamitous summer floods of 2007 show the impact such disasters have in the real world on the people and property caught in their wake. The floods, which produced the infamous image of Tewkesbury Abbey surrounded by a sea of brown water, killed 13 people and left 55,000 properties submerged. Over 7,000 people had to be rescued from floodwaters by the emergency services. Water and energy companies are taking part in Exercise Watermark following the loss of services to half a million people during the 2007 floods. The insurance industry have paid out £3bn in damages, ranking England's floods as the most expensive in the world in 2007, a year that saw 180 million people affected by 200 major floods around the world. Flooding is by far the deadliest natural disaster, easily outranking earthquakes and volcanoes in terms of human deaths.

 

 


Friday, December 04, 2009

UK Horizon-Scanning publications 

What's New on the Foresight Website

especially -

Guidance on analysing the future for policy development: The Foresight Horizon Scanning Centre has published a short guide outlining how futures techniques can be used for policy development.View the guidance document.


New scenario guidance published Foresight's new guidance note for policymakers explains the nuts and bolts of a important futures technique called scenario planning.  

Read the guidance

World Trade Scenarios published: The Foresight Horizon Scanning Centre has looked ahead to 2020 to understand how world trade might change. Commissioned by the Government's Trade Policy Unit as part of World Trade Week UK, the scenarios were used to stimulate discussion and debate at the opening conference.
Click here to download the scenarios. (pdf format)

Click below to view the video presentations of the scenarios shown at the World Trade Week UK Conference (on YouTube) Scenarios 1 and 2 (Global Innovation and Global Citizen) Scenarios 3 and 4 (Fragile Alliances and Deglobalisation)






Monday, November 23, 2009

European Research Area
This account of the seminar on"How can forward looking activities support the European Research Area (ERA)?" held on 2 June 2009, Brussels, leads to a note that purports to be the Outcome of the seminar . (I say "purports", because I am aware that several participants do not sign up to everything in this note.) The note makes a peculiar point, to whit that:
"• Forward looking activities (FLA) support long-term policy-making as they tackle fundamental issues like demographic changes, economic transformations, geopolitical issues and socio-ecological transition.
• "Forward looking" is broader concept than what is usually labelled as "Foresight". This concept includes Horizon Scanning, Forecasting, Vision-building, Participative Technology Assessment, Quantitative Models, Technology Roadmaps, and Scenario Building. Also European Technology Platforms may be considered to be under the concept of FLA. These approaches and tools have to be combined to debate and in the end to imagine the possible futures of European research, and identify such major societal challenges which should be addressed by research."
Assuming that this means what it says, it is portraying Foresight as something very narrow, that does not employ the techniques cited. This is of course incorrect, as even cursory examination of the Foresight literature - even documents poublished by the EC like the Practical Guide - will demonstrate. (The point about Technology Platforms not inherently being Foresight is right, though these platforms actually use Foresight.)

If this was a one-off misinterpretation, there would be little cause for concem. But a Google on "Forward-Looking Approaches" with SSH come up with a pattern of similar assessments, by P Valette and D Rossetti in particular. Examples:
  1. Forward Looking Approaches- Rossetti NCP 29.09.09

    Microsoft PowerPoint - Towards_a_new_approach_for_SSH-Rossetti

Microsoft PowerPoint - 3_VALETTE_Horizontal-aspects_n4s ...

They like to present a graphic:


This is decidedly confusing, adding category errors to the general mix-up. Specific tools like delphi and TRM are set alongside whole families of approaches like forecasting and modelling (which can contain these, just as Foresight can contain forecasting and modelling).

It is one thing for policymakers to use the language that is convenient for them politically, but quite another when research policymakers, no less, try to redefine terminology that is well-established in the scientific and practitioner communities. What does this imply for the quality and standing of EU Foresight research?


Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Finnish/Japanese comparative Foresight study 

TEKES Publications
Foresight for Our Future Society – Cooperative project between NISTEP (Japan) and Tekes (Finland) 242/2009
This sort of work is all too rare!



Thursday, May 28, 2009

UK Parliament - POST publications - science policy

332 - Futures and Foresight PDF Document May 2009

Four page POSTnote: "In 2007, the Commons Public Administration Select Committee (PASC) suggested that Parliament strengthen its capacity to think ahead and engage with outside experts and the wider public. This POSTnote examines the key characteristics of futures work and its current use by governments and parliaments. It covers futures work at national and local levels, and the extent to which it needs to consider social and other trends alongside developments in science and technology."

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?